What is the difference between Lexxe and Google in terms of keyword-based search?
The main difference between Lexxe and Google in terms of keyword-based search is "Linguistic Analysis". It means Lexxe treats the keywords as "words", not symbols. Google and all other 2nd generation search engines' algorithms place the quantity of the symbols as a priority, while Lexxe addresses the linguistic property within the keywords as a core issue for search. Lexxe uses sophisticated "Linguistic Computing" methods to analyse the keywords and decides what formula to use for the search depending on the linguistic features found.
Google actually performs badly and inconsistently in quite large number of keyword-based queries. The following are just a few examples. Please compare the following queries:
Another very important difference between Lexxe and Google is, Lexxe does not use "website popularity" as a factor to decide if a webpage is relevant or not. The relevance of a webpage is decided by the matching between the keywords and the content of the webpage based on Lexxe's linguistic unique computing philosophy and algorithms.
Users are gradually realizing the difference between the two paradigms from using and comparing the two different style search engines. After using Lexxe exclusively for a week, Robert C. May, of Business Pundit, USA, concluded that Lexxe "beats Google by a mile". Please see more in User Verdicts, where users, in some cases, directly compared Lexxe with Google with examples and their own experiences.
|
